On Monday, Alameda Research Ltd. Filed a suit against Voyager Digital HTC and LLC Trading Inc. In the US Bankruptcy Courtroom. The The lawsuit claims that defendants received preferential transfers from Alameda Research And that the plaintiffs seek to reclaim around $445.8 Million from Voyager HTC.
Legal There is a raging dispute over crypto asset transfers that were allegedly made by Alameda Research
An FTX Bankruptcy lawsuit was filed just recently. It reveals that Alameda ResearchThe defunct Quant trading agency was created by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) is seeking approximately $446 million from bankrupts Voyager Digital HTC Trading trade. Alameda’s According to legal experts, the corporation paid off outstanding loans. Voyager Bankruptcy in July. The The lawsuit also asserts that the transfer is recoverable as an administrative precedence under sections 503 and 507. Bankruptcy Code.
“The fall of Alameda and its affiliates amid allegations that Alameda was secretly borrowing billions of FTX exchange assets is widely known,” The file information. “Much of the (warranted) attention paid to the alleged misconduct of Alameda and his former leadership, now indicted, has largely missed the role played by Voyager and other cryptocurrency ‘lenders’ who funded Alameda and fueled that alleged misconduct, whether knowingly or carelessly. ”The criticism is provided by
When Voyager Bankruptcy in JulyIt also cited a loan default valuation of hundreds of thousands. Three Arrows Capital. After Voyager’s bankruptcy, Sam Bankman-Fried FTX and FTX suggested they could supply liquidity early. Voyager Digital Customers within the course of. They The detailed plans can then be used to buy Voyager Its belongings and the rest of its contents for $1.4 billion Shortly The rest of the article will be devoted to Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) opposed FTX’s supply, stating the state securities commissioner wanted it to “determine whether FTX US complies with the law.”
Alameda’s The attorneys state within the submitting, that after the agency paid Voyager Crypto belongings, it “was unable to determine whether [Voyager] had a valid and effective lien or security interest”. The plaintiffs’ lawyers consider the transfers to be “preferential transfers” that were “avoidable”. Alameda insists that he is entitled to payment for the transfers, which he says were “”This made it possible for the benefit of some of the defendants.”
What do you think about Alameda Research’s A lawsuit against Voyager Digital HTC Trading? Share Send us your feedback.
Thank you for your sharing. I am worried that I lack creative ideas. It is your article that makes me full of hope. Thank you. But, I have a question, can you help me?
I don’t think the title of your article matches the content lol. Just kidding, mainly because I had some doubts after reading the article.