Regulators Take Over Signature Bank and Bailout Depositors – Bitcoin News

Published:

The New York Department of Financial Services, or DFS, seized control of Signature Bank on Sunday. In a joint statement, the U.S. Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and FDIC revealed that all Signature depositors would be made whole, similar to the federal government’s decision to bail out California’s Silicon Valley Bank (SVB).

Government Takes Action to Protect Depositors and Reassure the Public of U.S. Banking System

Financial regulators have taken over Signature Bank, the crypto-friendly bank based in New York. Superintendent Adrienne Harris of the DFS announced the decision in a press release published on Sunday evening. Harris mentioned that Signature had approximately $110.36 billion in assets and total deposits of about $88.59 billion as of December 31, 2022.

This news follows the collapse of Silvergate Bank and the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, which was the second-largest bank failure in the U.S. since Washington Mutual’s, or Wamu’s, bankruptcy in 2008. While many market observers had to wait the whole weekend to hear what would happen with SVB, the public didn’t have to wait very long, as the U.S. Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, and FDIC released an update.

The joint statement, released at 6:15 p.m. ET, explained that the U.S. government had undertaken “decisive actions to protect the U.S. economy” and restore “public confidence in our banking system.” Following consultation with secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen, the FDIC and Federal Reserve approved a plan that fully secures all depositors. The government clarified that funds will be available for all depositors on March 13 and the resolution will “not be borne by the taxpayer.” The same resolution of protecting all depositors will also be applied to Signature Bank.

The Federal Reserve also announced the Bank Term Funding Program, or BTFP, to assist failed banks and their depositors. “The Department of the Treasury will make available up to $25 billion from the Exchange Stabilization Fund as a backstop for the BTFP. The Federal Reserve does not anticipate that it will be necessary to draw on these backstop funds,” the U.S. central bank declared.

The Board is closely monitoring developments in financial markets. The capital and liquidity positions of the U.S. banking system are strong and the U.S. financial system is resilient.

Tags in this story
Adrienne Harris, Assets, backstop, Bailout, bank collapse, Banking system, Bankruptcy, BTFP, crypto-friendly bank, deposit insurance, depositors, Exchange Stabilization Fund, failed banks, FDIC, Federal Reserve Bank Term Funding Program, Financial Institutions, Financial regulators, Funds, joint statement, market observers, New York Department of Financial Services, plan, Public confidence, Regulation, resolution, secretary of the Treasury, Signature Bank, Silicon Valley Bank, Silvergate Bank, superintendent, Taxpayer, total deposits, treasury department, U.S. Central Bank, U.S. economy, U.S. Federal Reserve

How do you think the government’s measures to protect depositors in the cases of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank will affect the banking industry and public trust in financial institutions? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

Jamie Redman

Jamie Redman is the News Lead at Bitcoin.com News and a financial tech journalist living in Florida. Redman has been an active member of the cryptocurrency community since 2011. He has a passion for Bitcoin, open-source code, and decentralized applications. Since September 2015, Redman has written more than 6,000 articles for Bitcoin.com News about the disruptive protocols emerging today.




Image Credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. It is not a direct offer or solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, or a recommendation or endorsement of any products, services, or companies. Bitcoin.com does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or

Related articles

Recent articles